Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HIALEAH HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HIALEAH HOSPITAL
CCN 100053 | FL | 340 beds | Current EBITDA $8.2M → Pro Forma $14.7M (+$6.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$124.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$6.6M
Modeled Uplift
$3.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.8M (vs $6.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$80K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.5M$2.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.4M$68K$2.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$382K$1.1M$1.5M$4.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$80K$80K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$623K$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$617K$1.2M$1.8M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$505K$1.0M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$40K$80K$80K$80K$80K$80K$80K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.3M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x
9.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x
10.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
11.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
12.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.8x
Headroom (turns)
28%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 28% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.7x, adding 3.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.2M$8.2M6.6%
Year 1$8.4M+$4.4M$12.8M10.3%
Year 2$8.7M+$6.6M$15.2M12.2%
Year 3$8.9M+$6.6M$15.5M12.4%
Year 4$9.2M+$6.6M$15.7M12.6%
Year 5$9.5M+$6.6M$16.0M12.9%
$81.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$176.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$94.5M
Value Created
$16.0M
Exit EBITDA
$13.0M
Organic Growth
$65.5M
RCM Value Creation
$16.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.5M$3.0M
A/R Days Reduction$758K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$40K$60K$80K$96K
Total$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$7.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 99 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.6%-4.8%5.1%18.6%
P53
Net-to-Gross9.8%10.0%14.4%20.6%
P20
Occupancy23.7%57.4%66.5%75.4%
P2
Rev/Bed$366K$878K$1.2M$1.4M
P3
Exp/Bed$342K$807K$997K$1.3M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML