Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ORLANDO HEALTH SOUTH LAKE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 18:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ORLANDO HEALTH SOUTH LAKE HOSPITAL
CCN 100051 | FL | 167 beds | Current EBITDA $23.8M → Pro Forma $41.2M (+$17.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$331.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$23.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$41.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$17.5M
Modeled Uplift
$13.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.3M (vs $17.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$212K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.6M$6.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.4M$182K$6.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.0M$3.0M$4.0M$12.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$212K$212K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT24.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$106K$212K$212K$212K$212K$212K$212K
Cumulative$0$4.8M$9.5M$14.2M$17.5M$17.5M$17.5M$17.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x
9.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x67% / 13.2x
10.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.1x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
11.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
12.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$23.8M$23.8M7.2%
Year 1$24.5M+$11.6M$36.1M10.9%
Year 2$25.2M+$17.5M$42.7M12.9%
Year 3$26.0M+$17.5M$43.4M13.1%
Year 4$26.8M+$17.5M$44.2M13.3%
Year 5$27.6M+$17.5M$45.0M13.6%
$237.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$495.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$257.4M
Value Created
$45.0M
Exit EBITDA
$37.9M
Organic Growth
$174.5M
RCM Value Creation
$45.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$8.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$7.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$106K$159K$212K$255K
Total$8.7M$13.1M$17.5M$20.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 124 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.2%-5.4%2.8%16.0%
P57
Net-to-Gross14.0%10.2%16.2%24.3%
P42
Occupancy89.3%51.1%64.2%75.4%
P95
Rev/Bed$2.0M$626K$1.0M$1.3M
P93
Exp/Bed$1.8M$629K$918K$1.2M
P90

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML