Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MARTIN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MARTIN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100044 | FL | 521 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.8M → Pro Forma $32.3M (+$35.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$666.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$35.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$32.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$35.1M
Modeled Uplift
$24.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $24.0M (vs $35.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$427K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$35.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.3M$13.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.8M$367K$13.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$6.1M$8.1M$25.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$427K$427K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.3M$6.7M$10.0M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$213K$427K$427K$427K$427K$427K$427K
Cumulative$0$9.5M$19.1M$28.4M$35.1M$35.1M$35.1M$35.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $35.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.2x
Headroom (turns)
111%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 111% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.7x, adding 99.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.8M$-2.8M-0.4%
Year 1$-2.9M+$23.4M$20.5M3.1%
Year 2$-3.0M+$35.1M$32.1M4.8%
Year 3$-3.1M+$35.1M$32.0M4.8%
Year 4$-3.2M+$35.1M$31.9M4.8%
Year 5$-3.3M+$35.1M$31.8M4.8%
$-28.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$349.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$377.9M
Value Created
$31.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.5M
Organic Growth
$350.6M
RCM Value Creation
$31.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.7M$10.0M$13.3M$16.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$15.8M
A/R Days Reduction$4.1M$6.1M$8.1M$9.7M
Clean Claim Rate$213K$320K$427K$512K
Total$17.5M$26.3M$35.1M$42.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 70 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.4%-5.4%5.2%18.8%
P33
Net-to-Gross18.7%10.2%16.8%20.5%
P55
Occupancy73.4%60.1%66.8%76.5%
P66
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.0M$1.2M$1.5M
P59
Exp/Bed$1.3M$849K$1.1M$1.4M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML