Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BROWARD HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:56 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BROWARD HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100039 | FL | 572 beds | Current EBITDA $-97.5M → Pro Forma $-69.6M (+$27.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$530.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-97.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-69.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$27.9M
Modeled Uplift
$18.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.5M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.4M (vs $27.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$339K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.6M$10.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.2M$292K$10.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.8M$6.5M$20.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$339K$339K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT21.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.3M$8.0M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.3M$7.9M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$170K$339K$339K$339K$339K$339K$339K
Cumulative$0$7.6M$15.2M$22.6M$27.9M$27.9M$27.9M$27.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-97.5M$-97.5M-18.4%
Year 1$-100.5M+$18.6M$-81.9M-15.4%
Year 2$-103.5M+$27.9M$-75.6M-14.3%
Year 3$-106.6M+$27.9M$-78.7M-14.8%
Year 4$-109.8M+$27.9M$-81.9M-15.4%
Year 5$-113.1M+$27.9M$-85.2M-16.1%
$-975.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-937.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$38.5M
Value Created
$-85.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-155.4M
Organic Growth
$279.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-85.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.3M$8.0M$10.6M$12.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.3M$7.9M$10.5M$12.6M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.8M$6.5M$7.7M
Clean Claim Rate$170K$255K$339K$407K
Total$13.9M$20.9M$27.9M$33.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-18.4%-5.3%6.4%18.4%
P5
Net-to-Gross19.0%10.1%18.2%21.2%
P61
Occupancy67.4%60.2%66.6%76.8%
P54
Rev/Bed$927K$1.1M$1.2M$1.6M
P19
Exp/Bed$1.1M$873K$1.1M$1.5M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML