Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MANATEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MANATEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 100035 | FL | 295 beds | Current EBITDA $5.9M → Pro Forma $24.2M (+$18.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$347.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$24.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$18.3M
Modeled Uplift
$13.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.5M (vs $18.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$222K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.0M$7.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.7M$191K$6.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.2M$13.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$222K$222K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.2M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$111K$222K$222K$222K$222K$222K$222K
Cumulative$0$5.0M$10.0M$14.8M$18.3M$18.3M$18.3M$18.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x94% / 27.8x99% / 31.2x103% / 34.7x105% / 36.4x107% / 38.1x
9.0x89% / 24.4x94% / 27.4x98% / 30.5x100% / 32.0x102% / 33.5x
10.0x85% / 21.6x89% / 24.4x93% / 27.1x95% / 28.5x97% / 29.9x
11.0x81% / 19.3x85% / 21.8x89% / 24.4x91% / 25.6x93% / 26.9x
12.0x77% / 17.4x82% / 19.8x86% / 22.1x88% / 23.2x89% / 24.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.4x
Headroom (turns)
68%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 68% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.1x, adding 6.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.9M$5.9M1.7%
Year 1$6.1M+$12.2M$18.3M5.3%
Year 2$6.3M+$18.3M$24.6M7.1%
Year 3$6.5M+$18.3M$24.8M7.1%
Year 4$6.7M+$18.3M$25.0M7.2%
Year 5$6.9M+$18.3M$25.2M7.2%
$59.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$276.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$217.5M
Value Created
$25.2M
Exit EBITDA
$9.4M
Organic Growth
$182.9M
RCM Value Creation
$25.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.4M$5.2M$6.9M$8.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$111K$167K$222K$267K
Total$9.1M$13.7M$18.3M$21.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 106 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.7%-5.0%3.9%17.0%
P45
Net-to-Gross9.6%10.0%14.4%20.5%
P18
Occupancy88.2%54.1%65.9%75.4%
P96
Rev/Bed$1.2M$854K$1.2M$1.4M
P52
Exp/Bed$1.2M$784K$1.0M$1.3M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML