Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ORLANDO HEALTH-HEALTH CENTRAL HOSPIT 2026-04-26 09:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ORLANDO HEALTH-HEALTH CENTRAL HOSPIT
CCN 100030 | FL | 284 beds | Current EBITDA $12.0M → Pro Forma $28.1M (+$16.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$306.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$28.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$16.1M
Modeled Uplift
$11.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.0M (vs $16.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$196K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.1M$6.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.9M$169K$6.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$940K$2.8M$3.7M$11.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$196K$196K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.6M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$98K$196K$196K$196K$196K$196K$196K
Cumulative$0$4.4M$8.8M$13.1M$16.1M$16.1M$16.1M$16.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x72% / 15.1x76% / 17.1x80% / 19.1x82% / 20.1x84% / 21.1x
9.0x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.8x75% / 16.6x77% / 17.5x79% / 18.4x
10.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x
11.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x
12.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.9x
Headroom (turns)
44%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 44% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.6x, adding 4.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.0M$12.0M3.9%
Year 1$12.4M+$10.7M$23.1M7.5%
Year 2$12.7M+$16.1M$28.9M9.4%
Year 3$13.1M+$16.1M$29.2M9.5%
Year 4$13.5M+$16.1M$29.6M9.7%
Year 5$13.9M+$16.1M$30.0M9.8%
$120.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$330.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$210.4M
Value Created
$30.0M
Exit EBITDA
$19.1M
Organic Growth
$161.2M
RCM Value Creation
$30.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.1M$4.6M$6.1M$7.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.6M$6.1M$7.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$98K$147K$196K$235K
Total$8.1M$12.1M$16.1M$19.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 108 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.9%-4.9%2.8%16.9%
P51
Net-to-Gross14.4%10.1%14.4%20.6%
P50
Occupancy63.8%53.2%64.8%75.4%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.1M$834K$1.2M$1.4M
P42
Exp/Bed$1.0M$769K$976K$1.3M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML