Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HOSPITAL
CCN 100008 | FL | 948 beds | Current EBITDA $184.7M → Pro Forma $274.7M (+$89.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.71B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$184.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$89.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$274.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$65.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$89.9M
Modeled Uplift
$55.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$34.6M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $55.3M (vs $89.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$34.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$33.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$20.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.1M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$89.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$34.2M$34.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$32.9M$940K$33.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$5.2M$15.6M$20.8M$65.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT22.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$8.5M$17.1M$25.6M$34.2M$34.2M$34.2M$34.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$8.5M$16.9M$25.4M$33.9M$33.9M$33.9M$33.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$6.9M$13.9M$20.8M$20.8M$20.8M$20.8M$20.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$547K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Cumulative$0$24.5M$49.0M$72.9M$89.9M$89.9M$89.9M$89.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $89.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x
9.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
10.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
11.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
12.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$184.7M$184.7M10.8%
Year 1$190.3M+$60.0M$250.2M14.6%
Year 2$196.0M+$89.9M$285.9M16.7%
Year 3$201.9M+$89.9M$291.8M17.1%
Year 4$207.9M+$89.9M$297.9M17.4%
Year 5$214.2M+$89.9M$304.1M17.8%
$1.85B
Entry EV (10x)
$3.35B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.50B
Value Created
$304.1M
Exit EBITDA
$294.2M
Organic Growth
$899.4M
RCM Value Creation
$304.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$17.1M$25.6M$34.2M$41.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$16.9M$25.4M$33.9M$40.6M
A/R Days Reduction$10.4M$15.6M$20.8M$25.0M
Clean Claim Rate$547K$821K$1.1M$1.3M
Total$45.0M$67.5M$89.9M$107.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.8%-8.5%0.9%8.3%
P79
Net-to-Gross24.8%17.3%19.2%22.4%
P90
Occupancy58.0%65.1%69.7%76.8%
P10
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.2M$1.4M$1.8M
P72
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.4M$1.9M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML