Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ORLANDO HEALTH 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ORLANDO HEALTH
CCN 100006 | FL | 1507 beds | Current EBITDA $-481.2M → Pro Forma $-356.1M (+$125.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.38B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-481.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$125.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-356.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$91.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$125.1M
Modeled Uplift
$77.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$48.1M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $77.0M (vs $125.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$47.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$47.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$28.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.5M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$125.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$47.6M$47.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$45.8M$1.3M$47.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$7.3M$21.6M$28.9M$91.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT23.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$11.9M$23.8M$35.7M$47.6M$47.6M$47.6M$47.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$11.8M$23.5M$35.3M$47.1M$47.1M$47.1M$47.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$9.6M$19.3M$28.9M$28.9M$28.9M$28.9M$28.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$761K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Cumulative$0$34.1M$68.1M$101.5M$125.1M$125.1M$125.1M$125.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $125.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-481.2M$-481.2M-20.2%
Year 1$-495.7M+$83.4M$-412.2M-17.3%
Year 2$-510.5M+$125.1M$-385.4M-16.2%
Year 3$-525.8M+$125.1M$-400.7M-16.8%
Year 4$-541.6M+$125.1M$-416.5M-17.5%
Year 5$-557.9M+$125.1M$-432.7M-18.2%
$-4.81B
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.76B
Exit EV (11x)
$52.1M
Value Created
$-432.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-766.5M
Organic Growth
$1.25B
RCM Value Creation
$-432.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$23.8M$35.7M$47.6M$57.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$23.5M$35.3M$47.1M$56.5M
A/R Days Reduction$14.5M$21.7M$28.9M$34.7M
Clean Claim Rate$761K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Total$62.6M$93.8M$125.1M$150.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 11 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.2%-14.8%2.5%8.2%
P18
Net-to-Gross13.2%17.6%19.7%23.6%
P0
Occupancy83.6%65.3%77.6%81.6%
P82
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.3M$1.7M$1.9M
P36
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.4M$1.8M$2.0M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML