Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPEC HOSPITAL WASHINGTON HADLEY 2026-04-26 08:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPEC HOSPITAL WASHINGTON HADLEY
CCN 092003 | DC | 82 beds | Current EBITDA $6.2M → Pro Forma $9.1M (+$3.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$56.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$3.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $3.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$690K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$36K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$31K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$174K$516K$690K$2.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$36K$36K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$284K$567K$851K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$281K$561K$842K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$230K$460K$690K$690K$690K$690K$690K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K
Cumulative$0$812K$1.6M$2.4M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
9.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
10.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
11.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
12.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.2M$6.2M10.9%
Year 1$6.3M+$2.0M$8.3M14.7%
Year 2$6.5M+$3.0M$9.5M16.8%
Year 3$6.7M+$3.0M$9.7M17.1%
Year 4$6.9M+$3.0M$9.9M17.5%
Year 5$7.1M+$3.0M$10.1M17.8%
$61.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$111.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$49.8M
Value Created
$10.1M
Exit EBITDA
$9.8M
Organic Growth
$29.8M
RCM Value Creation
$10.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$567K$851K$1.1M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$561K$842K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$345K$517K$690K$828K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$27K$36K$44K
Total$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 2167 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.9%-15.5%-3.4%8.0%
P80
Net-to-Gross64.8%21.1%30.4%41.9%
P92
Occupancy47.0%38.6%56.0%73.0%
P36
Rev/Bed$691K$402K$848K$1.6M
P44
Exp/Bed$616K$401K$902K$1.6M
P40

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML