Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV HOSPITAL
CCN 090001 | DC | 339 beds | Current EBITDA $-17.6M → Pro Forma $14.6M (+$32.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$612.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-17.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$32.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$23.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$32.2M
Modeled Uplift
$23.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.3M (vs $32.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$392K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$32.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.2M$12.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.8M$337K$12.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.9M$5.6M$7.4M$23.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$392K$392K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.1M$6.1M$9.2M$12.2M$12.2M$12.2M$12.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.0M$6.1M$9.1M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$196K$392K$392K$392K$392K$392K$392K
Cumulative$0$8.8M$17.5M$26.1M$32.2M$32.2M$32.2M$32.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $32.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-10.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
16.7x
Headroom (turns)
257%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 257% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -10.2x, adding 109.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-17.6M$-17.6M-2.9%
Year 1$-18.1M+$21.5M$3.3M0.5%
Year 2$-18.7M+$32.2M$13.5M2.2%
Year 3$-19.2M+$32.2M$12.9M2.1%
Year 4$-19.8M+$32.2M$12.4M2.0%
Year 5$-20.4M+$32.2M$11.8M1.9%
$-176.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$129.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$305.7M
Value Created
$11.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-28.1M
Organic Growth
$322.0M
RCM Value Creation
$11.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.1M$9.2M$12.2M$14.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.1M$9.1M$12.1M$14.5M
A/R Days Reduction$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$8.9M
Clean Claim Rate$196K$294K$392K$470K
Total$16.1M$24.1M$32.2M$38.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 1371 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.9%-13.1%-3.8%5.5%
P53
Net-to-Gross16.0%18.7%25.4%33.0%
P17
Occupancy80.3%57.7%69.6%78.1%
P80
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.1M$1.5M$2.0M
P67
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.1M$1.5M$2.1M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML