Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DOVER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DOVER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM
CCN 084004 | DE | 104 beds | Current EBITDA $2.1M → Pro Forma $3.6M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$410K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$556K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$550K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$338K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$556K$556K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$535K$15K$550K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$85K$253K$338K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$139K$278K$417K$556K$556K$556K$556K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$138K$275K$413K$550K$550K$550K$550K
A/R Days Reduction$0$113K$225K$338K$338K$338K$338K$338K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$398K$796K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x
9.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.1M$2.1M7.7%
Year 1$2.2M+$975K$3.2M11.5%
Year 2$2.3M+$1.5M$3.7M13.5%
Year 3$2.3M+$1.5M$3.8M13.7%
Year 4$2.4M+$1.5M$3.9M14.0%
Year 5$2.5M+$1.5M$4.0M14.2%
$21.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$43.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.0M
Value Created
$4.0M
Exit EBITDA
$3.4M
Organic Growth
$14.6M
RCM Value Creation
$4.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$278K$417K$556K$667K
Denial Rate Reductio$275K$413K$550K$660K
A/R Days Reduction$169K$254K$338K$406K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$731K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.7%-3.8%0.4%8.2%
P62
Net-to-Gross49.2%34.7%38.9%42.3%
P88
Occupancy84.2%66.3%71.7%78.3%
P75
Rev/Bed$267K$249K$575K$1.9M
P38
Exp/Bed$247K$242K$580K$2.0M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML