Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEADOW WOOD HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEADOW WOOD HOSPITAL
CCN 084003 | DE | 120 beds | Current EBITDA $2.9M → Pro Forma $4.5M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$444K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$609K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$603K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$371K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$609K$609K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$586K$17K$603K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$93K$277K$371K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$152K$305K$457K$609K$609K$609K$609K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$151K$302K$452K$603K$603K$603K$603K
A/R Days Reduction$0$124K$247K$371K$371K$371K$371K$371K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$436K$873K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x
9.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.1x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
10.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
11.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
12.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.9M$2.9M9.6%
Year 1$3.0M+$1.1M$4.1M13.4%
Year 2$3.1M+$1.6M$4.7M15.5%
Year 3$3.2M+$1.6M$4.8M15.8%
Year 4$3.3M+$1.6M$4.9M16.1%
Year 5$3.4M+$1.6M$5.0M16.4%
$29.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$55.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.7M
Value Created
$5.0M
Exit EBITDA
$4.7M
Organic Growth
$16.0M
RCM Value Creation
$5.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$305K$457K$609K$731K
Denial Rate Reductio$302K$452K$603K$724K
A/R Days Reduction$185K$278K$371K$445K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$19K$23K
Total$801K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 9 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.6%-2.5%-0.9%7.7%
P78
Net-to-Gross35.1%33.3%36.5%42.0%
P33
Occupancy84.5%67.9%68.7%76.4%
P89
Rev/Bed$254K$254K$884K$2.6M
P22
Exp/Bed$229K$247K$906K$2.6M
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML