Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ALFRED I DUPONT HOSP FOR CHILDREN 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ALFRED I DUPONT HOSP FOR CHILDREN
CCN 083300 | DE | 206 beds | Current EBITDA $120.0M → Pro Forma $156.5M (+$36.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$694.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$120.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$36.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$156.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$26.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$36.5M
Modeled Uplift
$27.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $27.1M (vs $36.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$444K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$36.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.9M$13.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.4M$382K$13.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.3M$8.4M$26.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$444K$444K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.5M$6.9M$10.4M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.4M$6.9M$10.3M$13.7M$13.7M$13.7M$13.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$222K$444K$444K$444K$444K$444K$444K
Cumulative$0$9.9M$19.9M$29.6M$36.5M$36.5M$36.5M$36.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $36.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$120.0M$120.0M17.3%
Year 1$123.6M+$24.3M$147.9M21.3%
Year 2$127.3M+$36.5M$163.8M23.6%
Year 3$131.1M+$36.5M$167.6M24.1%
Year 4$135.0M+$36.5M$171.5M24.7%
Year 5$139.1M+$36.5M$175.6M25.3%
$1.20B
Entry EV (10x)
$1.93B
Exit EV (11x)
$731.8M
Value Created
$175.6M
Exit EBITDA
$191.1M
Organic Growth
$365.1M
RCM Value Creation
$175.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.9M$10.4M$13.9M$16.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.9M$10.3M$13.7M$16.5M
A/R Days Reduction$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.1M
Clean Claim Rate$222K$333K$444K$533K
Total$18.3M$27.4M$36.5M$43.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.3%-1.7%0.7%8.2%
P88
Net-to-Gross42.0%34.2%36.0%41.4%
P75
Occupancy76.4%68.2%72.4%78.3%
P62
Rev/Bed$3.4M$264K$1.5M$2.6M
P88
Exp/Bed$2.8M$242K$1.6M$2.6M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML