Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM REHAB HOSPITAL OF DOVER 2026-04-26 02:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM REHAB HOSPITAL OF DOVER
CCN 083027 | DE | 34 beds | Current EBITDA $7.6M → Pro Forma $9.0M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

78%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$319K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 78% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$544K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$539K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$331K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$544K$544K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$524K$15K$539K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$83K$248K$331K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$136K$272K$408K$544K$544K$544K$544K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$135K$269K$404K$539K$539K$539K$539K
A/R Days Reduction$0$110K$221K$331K$331K$331K$331K$331K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$390K$779K$1.2M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.6M$7.6M28.0%
Year 1$7.8M+$954K$8.8M32.3%
Year 2$8.1M+$1.4M$9.5M35.0%
Year 3$8.3M+$1.4M$9.8M35.8%
Year 4$8.6M+$1.4M$10.0M36.8%
Year 5$8.8M+$1.4M$10.3M37.7%
$76.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$112.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$36.7M
Value Created
$10.3M
Exit EBITDA
$12.1M
Organic Growth
$14.3M
RCM Value Creation
$10.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$272K$408K$544K$653K
Denial Rate Reductio$269K$404K$539K$646K
A/R Days Reduction$166K$248K$331K$397K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$21K
Total$716K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 2636 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.0%-17.7%-5.3%5.2%
P97
Net-to-Gross62.5%29.2%41.6%56.1%
P84
Occupancy96.7%21.7%39.4%61.2%
P99
Rev/Bed$800K$464K$920K$1.8M
P45
Exp/Bed$576K$489K$1.0M$1.9M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML