Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 11:18 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 083026 | DE | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $8.2M → Pro Forma $9.7M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$362K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$584K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$578K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$355K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$584K$584K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$562K$16K$578K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$90K$266K$355K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$146K$292K$438K$584K$584K$584K$584K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$144K$289K$433K$578K$578K$578K$578K
A/R Days Reduction$0$118K$237K$355K$355K$355K$355K$355K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$418K$836K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.2M$8.2M28.0%
Year 1$8.4M+$1.0M$9.5M32.4%
Year 2$8.7M+$1.5M$10.2M35.0%
Year 3$8.9M+$1.5M$10.5M35.9%
Year 4$9.2M+$1.5M$10.7M36.8%
Year 5$9.5M+$1.5M$11.0M37.8%
$81.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$121.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$39.4M
Value Created
$11.0M
Exit EBITDA
$13.0M
Organic Growth
$15.4M
RCM Value Creation
$11.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$292K$438K$584K$701K
Denial Rate Reductio$289K$433K$578K$694K
A/R Days Reduction$178K$266K$355K$426K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$19K$22K
Total$768K$1.2M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 2738 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.0%-17.3%-4.8%6.2%
P97
Net-to-Gross86.1%28.3%40.1%54.8%
P97
Occupancy97.5%23.3%41.3%63.9%
P99
Rev/Bed$730K$445K$882K$1.8M
P44
Exp/Bed$525K$459K$997K$1.9M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML