Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NATCHAUG HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NATCHAUG HOSPITAL
CCN 074008 | CT | 59 beds | Current EBITDA $-13.6M → Pro Forma $-11.4M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$42.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-13.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-11.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$578K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$844K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$835K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$513K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$844K$844K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$812K$23K$835K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$129K$384K$513K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$211K$422K$633K$844K$844K$844K$844K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$209K$418K$626K$835K$835K$835K$835K
A/R Days Reduction$0$171K$342K$513K$513K$513K$513K$513K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$604K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-13.6M$-13.6M-32.2%
Year 1$-14.0M+$1.5M$-12.5M-29.7%
Year 2$-14.4M+$2.2M$-12.2M-28.9%
Year 3$-14.8M+$2.2M$-12.6M-29.9%
Year 4$-15.3M+$2.2M$-13.1M-31.0%
Year 5$-15.7M+$2.2M$-13.5M-32.1%
$-135.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-148.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$-13.0M
Value Created
$-13.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-21.6M
Organic Growth
$22.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-13.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$422K$633K$844K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$418K$626K$835K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$257K$385K$513K$616K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$27K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 12 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-32.2%-29.3%-15.2%-9.8%
P20
Net-to-Gross47.2%29.6%36.2%37.7%
P80
Occupancy81.9%32.6%56.4%75.3%
P75
Rev/Bed$715K$712K$1.2M$1.7M
P30
Exp/Bed$945K$917K$1.3M$1.8M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML