Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JOHNSTOWN HEIGHTS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 09:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JOHNSTOWN HEIGHTS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 064029 | CO | 92 beds | Current EBITDA $-94K → Pro Forma $665K (+$759K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-94K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$759K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$665K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$553K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$759K
Modeled Uplift
$492K
Risk-Adjusted
-$267K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$288K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$286K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$175K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$759K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$288K$288K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$277K$8K$286K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$44K$131K$175K$553K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$72K$144K$216K$288K$288K$288K$288K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$71K$143K$214K$286K$286K$286K$286K
A/R Days Reduction$0$58K$117K$175K$175K$175K$175K$175K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$207K$413K$615K$759K$759K$759K$759K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $759K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.7x
Headroom (turns)
118%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 118% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.2x, adding 100.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-94K$-94K-0.7%
Year 1$-97K+$506K$409K2.8%
Year 2$-100K+$759K$659K4.6%
Year 3$-103K+$759K$656K4.6%
Year 4$-106K+$759K$653K4.5%
Year 5$-109K+$759K$650K4.5%
$-941K
Entry EV (10x)
$7.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.1M
Value Created
$650K
Exit EBITDA
$-150K
Organic Growth
$7.6M
RCM Value Creation
$650K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$144K$216K$288K$346K
Denial Rate Reductio$143K$214K$286K$343K
A/R Days Reduction$88K$132K$175K$210K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$379K$569K$759K$911K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.7%-9.8%-1.7%5.6%
P64
Net-to-Gross37.9%20.4%29.6%37.0%
P76
Occupancy49.2%43.6%63.3%75.7%
P27
Rev/Bed$157K$335K$1.7M$2.2M
P5
Exp/Bed$158K$417K$1.5M$2.2M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML