Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
CCN 061324 | CO | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $578K → Pro Forma $7.4M (+$6.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$130.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$578K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$6.8M
Modeled Uplift
$4.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.6M (vs $6.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$83K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.6M$2.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.5M$72K$2.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$399K$1.2M$1.6M$5.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$83K$83K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$650K$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$644K$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$528K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$42K$83K$83K$83K$83K$83K$83K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.5M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x147% / 91.8x152% / 102.4x157% / 112.9x160% / 118.2x162% / 123.5x
9.0x141% / 81.2x146% / 90.6x151% / 100.0x154% / 104.7x156% / 109.4x
10.0x136% / 72.8x141% / 81.2x146% / 89.7x148% / 93.9x150% / 98.2x
11.0x131% / 65.9x136% / 73.6x141% / 81.2x143% / 85.1x145% / 88.9x
12.0x127% / 60.1x132% / 67.2x137% / 74.2x139% / 77.7x141% / 81.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.8x
Headroom (turns)
90%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 90% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.7x, adding 7.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$578K$578K0.4%
Year 1$595K+$4.6M$5.2M4.0%
Year 2$613K+$6.8M$7.5M5.7%
Year 3$631K+$6.8M$7.5M5.7%
Year 4$650K+$6.8M$7.5M5.8%
Year 5$670K+$6.8M$7.5M5.8%
$5.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$82.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$76.8M
Value Created
$7.5M
Exit EBITDA
$920K
Organic Growth
$68.4M
RCM Value Creation
$7.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M
A/R Days Reduction$791K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$42K$62K$83K$100K
Total$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.4%-10.9%-5.5%2.9%
P69
Net-to-Gross66.7%37.9%47.4%63.5%
P80
Occupancy26.0%21.9%31.6%52.4%
P35
Rev/Bed$5.2M$955K$1.9M$3.0M
P94
Exp/Bed$5.2M$1.0M$1.9M$2.8M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML