Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PROWERS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PROWERS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 061323 | CO | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-773K → Pro Forma $1.2M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$37.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-773K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$745K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$754K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$746K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$459K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$754K$754K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$725K$21K$746K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$116K$343K$459K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$188K$377K$565K$754K$754K$754K$754K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$187K$373K$560K$746K$746K$746K$746K
A/R Days Reduction$0$153K$306K$459K$459K$459K$459K$459K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$540K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
11.9x
Headroom (turns)
183%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 183% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -5.4x, adding 104.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-773K$-773K-2.0%
Year 1$-796K+$1.3M$526K1.4%
Year 2$-820K+$2.0M$1.2M3.1%
Year 3$-844K+$2.0M$1.1M3.0%
Year 4$-869K+$2.0M$1.1M3.0%
Year 5$-896K+$2.0M$1.1M2.9%
$-7.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$12.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.7M
Value Created
$1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.2M
Organic Growth
$19.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$377K$565K$754K$905K
Denial Rate Reductio$373K$560K$746K$895K
A/R Days Reduction$229K$344K$459K$550K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$991K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.0%-10.9%-5.5%2.9%
P63
Net-to-Gross70.0%37.9%47.4%63.5%
P86
Occupancy19.9%21.9%31.6%52.4%
P20
Rev/Bed$1.5M$955K$1.9M$3.0M
P37
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.0M$1.9M$2.8M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML