Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GUNNISON VALLEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GUNNISON VALLEY HOSPITAL
CCN 061320 | CO | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $1.8M → Pro Forma $5.1M (+$3.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$63.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$3.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.2M (vs $3.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$770K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$40K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$35K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$194K$576K$770K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$40K$40K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT65.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$316K$633K$949K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$313K$626K$939K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$257K$513K$770K$770K$770K$770K$770K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K
Cumulative$0$906K$1.8M$2.7M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x80% / 18.9x84% / 21.3x88% / 23.8x90% / 25.0x92% / 26.2x
9.0x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.6x83% / 20.8x85% / 21.9x87% / 23.0x
10.0x71% / 14.4x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.3x
11.0x67% / 12.8x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.2x
12.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.5x
Headroom (turns)
55%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 55% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.0x, adding 5.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.8M$1.8M2.8%
Year 1$1.8M+$2.2M$4.1M6.4%
Year 2$1.9M+$3.3M$5.2M8.3%
Year 3$1.9M+$3.3M$5.3M8.3%
Year 4$2.0M+$3.3M$5.3M8.4%
Year 5$2.1M+$3.3M$5.4M8.5%
$17.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$59.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$41.5M
Value Created
$5.4M
Exit EBITDA
$2.8M
Organic Growth
$33.3M
RCM Value Creation
$5.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$633K$949K$1.3M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$626K$939K$1.3M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$385K$577K$770K$924K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$40K$49K
Total$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 47 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.8%-14.9%-5.8%2.9%
P72
Net-to-Gross55.2%41.2%50.8%65.2%
P55
Occupancy32.9%21.6%30.6%48.4%
P57
Rev/Bed$3.2M$794K$1.8M$3.0M
P77
Exp/Bed$3.1M$965K$1.8M$2.8M
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML