Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST VINCENT GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST VINCENT GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 061319 | CO | 8 beds | Current EBITDA $-12.5M → Pro Forma $-11.8M (+$694K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-12.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$694K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-11.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$504K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$694K
Modeled Uplift
$432K
Risk-Adjusted
-$262K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$263K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$261K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$160K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$694K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$263K$263K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$253K$8K$261K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$40K$120K$160K$504K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT71.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$66K$131K$197K$263K$263K$263K$263K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$65K$131K$196K$261K$261K$261K$261K
A/R Days Reduction$0$53K$107K$160K$160K$160K$160K$160K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$189K$378K$563K$694K$694K$694K$694K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $694K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-12.5M$-12.5M-94.9%
Year 1$-12.9M+$463K$-12.4M-94.3%
Year 2$-13.2M+$694K$-12.5M-95.4%
Year 3$-13.6M+$694K$-12.9M-98.4%
Year 4$-14.0M+$694K$-13.4M-101.6%
Year 5$-14.5M+$694K$-13.8M-104.8%
$-124.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-151.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-26.7M
Value Created
$-13.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-19.9M
Organic Growth
$6.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-13.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$131K$197K$263K$316K
Denial Rate Reductio$131K$196K$261K$314K
A/R Days Reduction$80K$120K$160K$192K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$347K$520K$694K$833K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 11 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-29.0%-14.0%-4.2%
P0
Net-to-Gross47.8%51.5%64.1%71.1%
P27
Occupancy20.7%17.3%22.5%25.0%
P36
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.5M$2.0M$2.9M
P45
Exp/Bed$3.2M$1.7M$2.0M$3.2M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML