Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RANGELY DISTRICT HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RANGELY DISTRICT HOSPITAL
CCN 061307 | CO | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.1M → Pro Forma $-4.2M (+$848K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$848K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$618K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$848K
Modeled Uplift
$552K
Risk-Adjusted
-$296K
Execution Discount
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Payer Diversity. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$322K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$319K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$196K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$848K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$322K$322K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$310K$9K$319K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$49K$147K$196K$618K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$81K$161K$242K$322K$322K$322K$322K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$80K$160K$239K$319K$319K$319K$319K
A/R Days Reduction$0$65K$131K$196K$196K$196K$196K$196K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$231K$462K$688K$848K$848K$848K$848K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $848K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.1M$-5.1M-31.4%
Year 1$-5.2M+$565K$-4.7M-28.9%
Year 2$-5.4M+$848K$-4.5M-28.1%
Year 3$-5.5M+$848K$-4.7M-29.1%
Year 4$-5.7M+$848K$-4.9M-30.1%
Year 5$-5.9M+$848K$-5.0M-31.2%
$-50.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-55.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-4.6M
Value Created
$-5.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-8.1M
Organic Growth
$8.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$161K$242K$322K$387K
Denial Rate Reductio$160K$239K$319K$383K
A/R Days Reduction$98K$147K$196K$235K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$424K$636K$848K$1.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-31.4%-10.9%-5.5%2.9%
P8
Net-to-Gross100.0%37.9%47.4%63.5%
P96
Occupancy54.2%21.9%31.6%52.4%
P76
Rev/Bed$645K$955K$1.9M$3.0M
P20
Exp/Bed$848K$1.0M$1.9M$2.8M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML