Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HAXTUN HOSPITAL DISTRICT 2026-04-26 17:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HAXTUN HOSPITAL DISTRICT
CCN 061304 | CO | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $25K → Pro Forma $711K (+$687K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$25K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$687K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$711K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$499K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$687K
Modeled Uplift
$505K
Risk-Adjusted
-$181K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$260K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$259K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$158K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$687K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$260K$260K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$250K$8K$259K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$40K$118K$158K$499K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$65K$130K$195K$260K$260K$260K$260K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$65K$129K$194K$259K$259K$259K$259K
A/R Days Reduction$0$53K$106K$158K$158K$158K$158K$158K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$187K$375K$557K$687K$687K$687K$687K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $687K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x191% / 209.3x197% / 232.9x203% / 256.5x206% / 268.3x209% / 280.1x
9.0x184% / 185.7x190% / 206.7x196% / 227.7x199% / 238.2x201% / 248.6x
10.0x178% / 166.8x184% / 185.7x190% / 204.6x192% / 214.0x195% / 223.4x
11.0x173% / 151.3x179% / 168.5x184% / 185.7x187% / 194.3x189% / 202.8x
12.0x168% / 138.4x174% / 154.2x179% / 169.9x182% / 177.8x184% / 185.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.2x
Headroom (turns)
95%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 95% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.3x, adding 8.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$25K$25K0.2%
Year 1$25K+$458K$483K3.7%
Year 2$26K+$687K$713K5.5%
Year 3$27K+$687K$714K5.5%
Year 4$28K+$687K$714K5.5%
Year 5$29K+$687K$715K5.5%
$246K
Entry EV (10x)
$7.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.6M
Value Created
$715K
Exit EBITDA
$39K
Organic Growth
$6.9M
RCM Value Creation
$715K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$130K$195K$260K$312K
Denial Rate Reductio$129K$194K$259K$310K
A/R Days Reduction$79K$119K$158K$190K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$343K$515K$687K$824K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.2%-10.9%-5.5%2.9%
P67
Net-to-Gross78.1%37.9%47.4%63.5%
P92
Occupancy84.9%21.9%31.6%52.4%
P90
Rev/Bed$520K$955K$1.9M$3.0M
P12
Exp/Bed$519K$1.0M$1.9M$2.8M
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML