Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FAMILY HEALTH WEST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FAMILY HEALTH WEST HOSPITAL
CCN 061302 | CO | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $4.0M → Pro Forma $7.3M (+$3.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$62.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$3.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$899K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$761K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$40K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$34K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$192K$569K$761K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$40K$40K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$313K$626K$939K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$310K$620K$929K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$254K$508K$761K$761K$761K$761K$761K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K
Cumulative$0$896K$1.8M$2.7M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.3x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x
9.0x57% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
10.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
11.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
12.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.9x
Headroom (turns)
29%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 29% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.0M$4.0M6.4%
Year 1$4.1M+$2.2M$6.3M10.1%
Year 2$4.2M+$3.3M$7.5M12.0%
Year 3$4.4M+$3.3M$7.7M12.2%
Year 4$4.5M+$3.3M$7.8M12.4%
Year 5$4.6M+$3.3M$7.9M12.7%
$39.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$87.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$47.2M
Value Created
$7.9M
Exit EBITDA
$6.4M
Organic Growth
$32.9M
RCM Value Creation
$7.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$626K$939K$1.3M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$620K$929K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$381K$571K$761K$914K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$40K$48K
Total$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.4%-10.9%-5.5%2.9%
P86
Net-to-Gross45.2%37.9%47.4%63.5%
P41
Occupancy65.4%21.9%31.6%52.4%
P86
Rev/Bed$2.5M$955K$1.9M$3.0M
P69
Exp/Bed$2.3M$1.0M$1.9M$2.8M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML