Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UCHEALTH HIGHLANDS RANCH HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 07:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UCHEALTH HIGHLANDS RANCH HOSPITAL
CCN 060132 | CO | 93 beds | Current EBITDA $-10.9M → Pro Forma $1.4M (+$12.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$235.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-10.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$12.4M
Modeled Uplift
$9.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.4M (vs $12.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$151K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.7M$4.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.5M$129K$4.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$722K$2.1M$2.9M$9.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$151K$151K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.5M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$954K$1.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$75K$151K$151K$151K$151K$151K$151K
Cumulative$0$3.4M$6.7M$10.0M$12.4M$12.4M$12.4M$12.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-63.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
70.3x
Headroom (turns)
1082%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1082% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -63.8x, adding 162.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-10.9M$-10.9M-4.6%
Year 1$-11.3M+$8.2M$-3.0M-1.3%
Year 2$-11.6M+$12.4M$784K0.3%
Year 3$-11.9M+$12.4M$436K0.2%
Year 4$-12.3M+$12.4M$78K0.0%
Year 5$-12.7M+$12.4M$-291K-0.1%
$-109.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$106.1M
Value Created
$-291K
Exit EBITDA
$-17.4M
Organic Growth
$123.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-291K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.4M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.4M$2.1M$2.9M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$75K$113K$151K$181K
Total$6.2M$9.3M$12.4M$14.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.6%-9.8%-1.7%5.6%
P42
Net-to-Gross19.4%20.4%29.6%37.0%
P19
Occupancy81.5%43.6%63.3%75.7%
P81
Rev/Bed$2.5M$335K$1.7M$2.2M
P84
Exp/Bed$2.6M$417K$1.5M$2.2M
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML