Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UCHEALTH LONGS PEAK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UCHEALTH LONGS PEAK HOSPITAL
CCN 060128 | CO | 83 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.1M → Pro Forma $6.5M (+$9.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$181.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$9.6M
Modeled Uplift
$7.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.2M (vs $9.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$116K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.6M$3.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.5M$100K$3.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$558K$1.7M$2.2M$7.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$116K$116K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$909K$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$900K$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$737K$1.5M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$58K$116K$116K$116K$116K$116K$116K
Cumulative$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-4.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
10.6x
Headroom (turns)
163%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 163% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -4.1x, adding 103.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.1M$-3.1M-1.7%
Year 1$-3.2M+$6.4M$3.2M1.7%
Year 2$-3.3M+$9.6M$6.3M3.4%
Year 3$-3.4M+$9.6M$6.2M3.4%
Year 4$-3.5M+$9.6M$6.1M3.3%
Year 5$-3.6M+$9.6M$6.0M3.3%
$-31.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$65.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$96.6M
Value Created
$6.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.0M
Organic Growth
$95.6M
RCM Value Creation
$6.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$58K$87K$116K$140K
Total$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.7%-9.8%-2.7%4.6%
P53
Net-to-Gross17.4%19.9%29.6%37.0%
P19
Occupancy78.4%43.6%62.1%72.0%
P81
Rev/Bed$2.2M$335K$1.4M$2.2M
P73
Exp/Bed$2.2M$417K$1.5M$2.3M
P70

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML