Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ANIMAS SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ANIMAS SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 060117 | CO | 12 beds | Current EBITDA $6.5M → Pro Forma $9.0M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$47.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$840K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$949K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$939K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$577K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$30K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$949K$949K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$913K$26K$939K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$146K$432K$577K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT67.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$237K$474K$712K$949K$949K$949K$949K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$235K$470K$704K$939K$939K$939K$939K
A/R Days Reduction$0$192K$385K$577K$577K$577K$577K$577K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K
Cumulative$0$680K$1.4M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.5M$6.5M13.7%
Year 1$6.7M+$1.7M$8.3M17.6%
Year 2$6.9M+$2.5M$9.4M19.8%
Year 3$7.1M+$2.5M$9.6M20.2%
Year 4$7.3M+$2.5M$9.8M20.7%
Year 5$7.5M+$2.5M$10.0M21.1%
$64.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$110.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$45.3M
Value Created
$10.0M
Exit EBITDA
$10.3M
Organic Growth
$25.0M
RCM Value Creation
$10.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$474K$712K$949K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$470K$704K$939K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$289K$433K$577K$693K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$30K$36K
Total$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 22 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.7%-15.3%-7.1%-0.2%
P91
Net-to-Gross27.9%46.6%56.7%67.5%
P14
Occupancy26.5%18.5%25.0%36.2%
P55
Rev/Bed$4.0M$1.3M$1.9M$2.9M
P91
Exp/Bed$3.4M$1.6M$2.0M$3.0M
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML