Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTURA PARKER ADVENTIST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTURA PARKER ADVENTIST HOSPITAL
CCN 060114 | CO | 162 beds | Current EBITDA $45.3M → Pro Forma $63.8M (+$18.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$351.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$45.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$63.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$18.5M
Modeled Uplift
$13.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.1M (vs $18.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$225K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.0M$7.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.8M$193K$7.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.3M$13.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$225K$225K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$112K$225K$225K$225K$225K$225K$225K
Cumulative$0$5.0M$10.1M$15.0M$18.5M$18.5M$18.5M$18.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
11.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$45.3M$45.3M12.9%
Year 1$46.7M+$12.3M$59.0M16.8%
Year 2$48.1M+$18.5M$66.6M18.9%
Year 3$49.5M+$18.5M$68.0M19.3%
Year 4$51.0M+$18.5M$69.5M19.8%
Year 5$52.5M+$18.5M$71.0M20.2%
$453.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$781.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$328.1M
Value Created
$71.0M
Exit EBITDA
$72.2M
Organic Growth
$184.9M
RCM Value Creation
$71.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$8.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$112K$169K$225K$270K
Total$9.2M$13.9M$18.5M$22.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.9%-10.5%-1.0%8.8%
P85
Net-to-Gross21.3%17.4%21.6%30.9%
P47
Occupancy62.1%55.9%64.3%75.0%
P35
Rev/Bed$2.2M$869K$1.7M$2.2M
P71
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.1M$1.7M$2.0M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML