Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SKY RIDGE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SKY RIDGE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 060112 | CO | 273 beds | Current EBITDA $157.5M → Pro Forma $186.1M (+$28.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$544.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$157.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$28.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$186.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$28.7M
Modeled Uplift
$20.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.1M (vs $28.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$349K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$28.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.9M$10.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.5M$300K$10.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$5.0M$6.6M$20.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$349K$349K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT23.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.2M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$174K$349K$349K$349K$349K$349K$349K
Cumulative$0$7.8M$15.6M$23.2M$28.7M$28.7M$28.7M$28.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $28.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.7x39% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$157.5M$157.5M28.9%
Year 1$162.2M+$19.1M$181.3M33.3%
Year 2$167.1M+$28.7M$195.7M35.9%
Year 3$172.1M+$28.7M$200.7M36.9%
Year 4$177.2M+$28.7M$205.9M37.8%
Year 5$182.5M+$28.7M$211.2M38.8%
$1.57B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.32B
Exit EV (11x)
$748.5M
Value Created
$211.2M
Exit EBITDA
$250.8M
Organic Growth
$286.5M
RCM Value Creation
$211.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.4M$8.2M$10.9M$13.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$12.9M
A/R Days Reduction$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$8.0M
Clean Claim Rate$174K$261K$349K$418K
Total$14.3M$21.5M$28.7M$34.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.9%-7.1%1.2%11.2%
P96
Net-to-Gross9.9%14.9%18.2%23.9%
P9
Occupancy64.4%61.7%66.1%75.5%
P35
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.6M$2.0M$2.3M
P48
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.5M$1.9M$2.4M
P13

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML