Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STERLING REGIONAL MEDCENTER 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STERLING REGIONAL MEDCENTER
CCN 060076 | CO | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $1.8M → Pro Forma $4.9M (+$3.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$57.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$3.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $3.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$702K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$37K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$32K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$177K$525K$702K$2.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$37K$37K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$289K$577K$866K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$286K$571K$857K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$234K$468K$702K$702K$702K$702K$702K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K
Cumulative$0$827K$1.7M$2.5M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x77% / 17.3x81% / 19.6x85% / 21.9x87% / 23.0x89% / 24.1x
9.0x72% / 15.0x76% / 17.0x80% / 19.1x82% / 20.1x84% / 21.1x
10.0x67% / 13.2x72% / 15.0x76% / 16.8x78% / 17.7x80% / 18.7x
11.0x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x76% / 16.7x
12.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.3x
Headroom (turns)
51%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 51% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.2x, adding 5.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.8M$1.8M3.2%
Year 1$1.9M+$2.0M$3.9M6.8%
Year 2$2.0M+$3.0M$5.0M8.6%
Year 3$2.0M+$3.0M$5.0M8.7%
Year 4$2.1M+$3.0M$5.1M8.9%
Year 5$2.1M+$3.0M$5.2M9.0%
$18.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$56.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$38.5M
Value Created
$5.2M
Exit EBITDA
$2.9M
Organic Growth
$30.4M
RCM Value Creation
$5.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$577K$866K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$571K$857K$1.1M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$351K$527K$702K$843K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$28K$37K$44K
Total$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.2%-10.9%-5.5%2.9%
P76
Net-to-Gross48.6%37.9%47.4%63.5%
P51
Occupancy31.6%21.9%31.6%52.4%
P49
Rev/Bed$2.3M$955K$1.9M$3.0M
P65
Exp/Bed$2.2M$1.0M$1.9M$2.8M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML