Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROSE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROSE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 060032 | CO | 253 beds | Current EBITDA $76.3M → Pro Forma $94.6M (+$18.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$347.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$76.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$94.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$18.3M
Modeled Uplift
$12.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.5M (vs $18.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$222K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.9M$6.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.7M$191K$6.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.2M$13.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$222K$222K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT23.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.2M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$111K$222K$222K$222K$222K$222K$222K
Cumulative$0$5.0M$9.9M$14.8M$18.3M$18.3M$18.3M$18.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$76.3M$76.3M22.0%
Year 1$78.6M+$12.2M$90.8M26.1%
Year 2$81.0M+$18.3M$99.2M28.6%
Year 3$83.4M+$18.3M$101.7M29.3%
Year 4$85.9M+$18.3M$104.2M30.0%
Year 5$88.5M+$18.3M$106.7M30.7%
$763.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.17B
Exit EV (11x)
$410.9M
Value Created
$106.7M
Exit EBITDA
$121.5M
Organic Growth
$182.6M
RCM Value Creation
$106.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.5M$5.2M$6.9M$8.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.4M$5.2M$6.9M$8.2M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$111K$167K$222K$267K
Total$9.1M$13.7M$18.3M$21.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.0%-7.1%1.2%11.2%
P83
Net-to-Gross11.3%17.2%18.2%23.9%
P13
Occupancy59.8%60.6%65.6%74.1%
P22
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.6M$2.0M$2.3M
P9
Exp/Bed$1.1M$1.5M$1.9M$2.4M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML