Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BOULDER COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BOULDER COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 060027 | CO | 139 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.9M → Pro Forma $15.1M (+$22.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$418.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$22.0M
Modeled Uplift
$15.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.1M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.9M (vs $22.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$268K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.4M$8.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.1M$230K$8.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.8M$5.1M$16.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$268K$268K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$134K$268K$268K$268K$268K$268K$268K
Cumulative$0$6.0M$12.0M$17.8M$22.0M$22.0M$22.0M$22.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-3.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
10.4x
Headroom (turns)
159%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 159% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -3.9x, adding 102.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.9M$-6.9M-1.6%
Year 1$-7.1M+$14.7M$7.6M1.8%
Year 2$-7.3M+$22.0M$14.7M3.5%
Year 3$-7.5M+$22.0M$14.5M3.5%
Year 4$-7.7M+$22.0M$14.3M3.4%
Year 5$-8.0M+$22.0M$14.0M3.4%
$-68.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$154.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$223.1M
Value Created
$14.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-11.0M
Organic Growth
$220.1M
RCM Value Creation
$14.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.1M$6.2M$8.3M$9.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
Clean Claim Rate$134K$201K$268K$321K
Total$11.0M$16.5M$22.0M$26.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 35 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.6%-10.4%-1.3%8.7%
P47
Net-to-Gross19.9%17.6%23.2%30.8%
P37
Occupancy61.4%56.2%64.4%74.6%
P31
Rev/Bed$3.0M$934K$1.7M$2.2M
P91
Exp/Bed$3.1M$1.1M$1.8M$2.2M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML