Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTURA ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTURA ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL
CCN 060015 | CO | 220 beds | Current EBITDA $5.8M → Pro Forma $31.2M (+$25.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$483.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$25.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$31.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$25.4M
Modeled Uplift
$18.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.8M (vs $25.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$309K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$25.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.7M$9.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.3M$266K$9.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.4M$5.9M$18.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$309K$309K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT26.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$155K$309K$309K$309K$309K$309K$309K
Cumulative$0$6.9M$13.8M$20.6M$25.4M$25.4M$25.4M$25.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $25.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x107% / 37.6x111% / 42.1x116% / 46.6x118% / 48.9x120% / 51.2x
9.0x101% / 33.0x106% / 37.0x110% / 41.1x112% / 43.1x114% / 45.1x
10.0x97% / 29.4x101% / 33.0x106% / 36.6x108% / 38.5x109% / 40.3x
11.0x92% / 26.4x97% / 29.7x101% / 33.0x103% / 34.7x105% / 36.3x
12.0x89% / 24.0x93% / 27.0x97% / 30.0x99% / 31.5x101% / 33.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.9x
Headroom (turns)
76%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 76% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.6x, adding 6.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.8M$5.8M1.2%
Year 1$5.9M+$16.9M$22.9M4.7%
Year 2$6.1M+$25.4M$31.5M6.5%
Year 3$6.3M+$25.4M$31.7M6.6%
Year 4$6.5M+$25.4M$31.9M6.6%
Year 5$6.7M+$25.4M$32.1M6.6%
$57.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$353.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$295.5M
Value Created
$32.1M
Exit EBITDA
$9.2M
Organic Growth
$254.2M
RCM Value Creation
$32.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.8M$7.2M$9.7M$11.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M
Clean Claim Rate$155K$232K$309K$371K
Total$12.7M$19.1M$25.4M$30.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 24 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.2%-8.4%2.7%11.9%
P42
Net-to-Gross17.5%15.9%18.8%26.9%
P38
Occupancy81.0%61.0%64.8%73.2%
P83
Rev/Bed$2.2M$1.5M$1.8M$2.3M
P67
Exp/Bed$2.2M$1.4M$1.8M$2.1M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML