Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAKERSFIELD BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE HO 2026-04-27 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAKERSFIELD BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE HO
CCN 054155 | CA | 90 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.9M → Pro Forma $-5.9M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 054155

BAKERSFIELD BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE HO
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$19.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-5.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$736K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$672K
Risk-Adjusted
-$337K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$384K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$380K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$233K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$384K$384K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$369K$11K$380K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$59K$175K$233K$736K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$96K$192K$288K$384K$384K$384K$384K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$95K$190K$285K$380K$380K$380K$380K
A/R Days Reduction$0$78K$156K$233K$233K$233K$233K$233K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$275K$550K$818K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.9M$-6.9M-35.9%
Year 1$-7.1M+$673K$-6.4M-33.4%
Year 2$-7.3M+$1.0M$-6.3M-32.8%
Year 3$-7.5M+$1.0M$-6.5M-33.9%
Year 4$-7.7M+$1.0M$-6.7M-35.1%
Year 5$-8.0M+$1.0M$-7.0M-36.3%
$-68.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-76.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$-7.8M
Value Created
$-7.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-11.0M
Organic Growth
$10.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-7.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$192K$288K$384K$460K
Denial Rate Reductio$190K$285K$380K$456K
A/R Days Reduction$117K$175K$233K$280K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$15K
Total$505K$757K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 166 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-35.9%-19.1%-3.7%4.6%
P11
Net-to-Gross50.8%18.9%24.3%35.6%
P84
Occupancy56.3%43.8%57.0%74.5%
P47
Rev/Bed$213K$503K$949K$2.1M
P4
Exp/Bed$290K$580K$1.1M$2.2M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML