Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAN JOSE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAN JOSE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 054154 | CA | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $10.3M → Pro Forma $12.7M (+$2.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$45.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$635K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$909K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$900K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$553K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$29K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$909K$909K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$875K$25K$900K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$139K$414K$553K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$29K$29K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$227K$454K$682K$909K$909K$909K$909K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$225K$450K$675K$900K$900K$900K$900K
A/R Days Reduction$0$184K$369K$553K$553K$553K$553K$553K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K
Cumulative$0$651K$1.3M$1.9M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x59% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.3M$10.3M22.7%
Year 1$10.6M+$1.6M$12.2M26.8%
Year 2$10.9M+$2.4M$13.3M29.3%
Year 3$11.2M+$2.4M$13.6M30.0%
Year 4$11.6M+$2.4M$14.0M30.8%
Year 5$11.9M+$2.4M$14.3M31.5%
$102.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$157.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.6M
Value Created
$14.3M
Exit EBITDA
$16.4M
Organic Growth
$23.9M
RCM Value Creation
$14.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$454K$682K$909K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$450K$675K$900K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$277K$415K$553K$664K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$22K$29K$35K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 153 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.7%-22.0%-5.1%3.6%
P95
Net-to-Gross56.7%19.1%25.1%36.9%
P89
Occupancy89.9%43.2%57.0%71.9%
P92
Rev/Bed$568K$508K$894K$2.1M
P29
Exp/Bed$439K$597K$1.0M$2.3M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML