Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TELECARE SANTA CRUZ PHF 2026-04-26 09:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TELECARE SANTA CRUZ PHF
CCN 054152 | CA | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $528K → Pro Forma $1.0M (+$502K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$528K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$502K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+533bps
Margin Improvement
$361K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$502K
Modeled Uplift
$359K
Risk-Adjusted
-$143K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$189K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$188K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$114K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$502K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$181K$8K$189K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$188K$188K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$29K$86K$114K$361K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$47K$95K$142K$189K$189K$189K$189K
Cost to Collect$0$47K$94K$141K$188K$188K$188K$188K
A/R Days Reduction$0$38K$76K$114K$114K$114K$114K$114K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$137K$275K$407K$502K$502K$502K$502K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $502K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.9x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.3x
9.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.0x
10.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x
11.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
12.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.2x
Headroom (turns)
33%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 33% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.3x, adding 4.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$528K$528K5.6%
Year 1$544K+$334K$879K9.3%
Year 2$560K+$502K$1.1M11.3%
Year 3$577K+$502K$1.1M11.5%
Year 4$595K+$502K$1.1M11.7%
Year 5$612K+$502K$1.1M11.8%
$5.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$12.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.0M
Value Created
$1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$841K
Organic Growth
$5.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$95K$142K$189K$227K
Cost to Collect$94K$141K$188K$226K
A/R Days Reduction$57K$86K$114K$137K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$251K$376K$502K$602K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.6%-22.1%-10.2%2.0%
P84
Net-to-Gross100.0%29.8%42.3%63.4%
P96
Occupancy84.7%19.9%35.2%62.2%
P98
Rev/Bed$588K$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M
P13
Exp/Bed$555K$1.3M$2.7M$3.9M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML