Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PACIFIC GROVE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PACIFIC GROVE HOSPITAL
CCN 054130 | CA | 68 beds | Current EBITDA $-639K → Pro Forma $318K (+$957K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-639K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$957K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$318K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$697K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$957K
Modeled Uplift
$677K
Risk-Adjusted
-$280K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$364K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$360K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$221K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$957K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$364K$364K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$350K$10K$360K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$56K$165K$221K$697K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$91K$182K$273K$364K$364K$364K$364K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$90K$180K$270K$360K$360K$360K$360K
A/R Days Reduction$0$74K$147K$221K$221K$221K$221K$221K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$260K$521K$776K$957K$957K$957K$957K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $957K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-17.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
23.5x
Headroom (turns)
361%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 361% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -17.0x, adding 116.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-639K$-639K-3.5%
Year 1$-658K+$638K$-20K-0.1%
Year 2$-677K+$957K$279K1.5%
Year 3$-698K+$957K$259K1.4%
Year 4$-719K+$957K$238K1.3%
Year 5$-740K+$957K$216K1.2%
$-6.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.8M
Value Created
$216K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.0M
Organic Growth
$9.6M
RCM Value Creation
$216K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$182K$273K$364K$436K
Denial Rate Reductio$180K$270K$360K$432K
A/R Days Reduction$111K$166K$221K$265K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$478K$717K$957K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 136 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.5%-22.0%-5.7%1.9%
P56
Net-to-Gross37.8%19.9%26.0%41.4%
P72
Occupancy75.5%41.4%55.3%71.3%
P79
Rev/Bed$267K$498K$799K$1.9M
P7
Exp/Bed$277K$524K$868K$1.9M
P5

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML