Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AURORA LAS ENCINAS BHS 2026-04-26 06:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AURORA LAS ENCINAS BHS
CCN 054078 | CA | 96 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M → Pro Forma $3.1M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$478K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$684K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$677K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$416K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$684K$684K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$658K$19K$677K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$105K$311K$416K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$171K$342K$513K$684K$684K$684K$684K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$169K$338K$508K$677K$677K$677K$677K
A/R Days Reduction$0$139K$277K$416K$416K$416K$416K$416K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$490K$979K$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x73% / 15.6x78% / 17.7x82% / 19.8x84% / 20.9x85% / 21.9x
9.0x68% / 13.5x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.2x80% / 19.1x
10.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.1x76% / 16.9x
11.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x
12.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.0x
Headroom (turns)
46%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 46% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.5x, adding 5.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3M$1.3M3.7%
Year 1$1.3M+$1.2M$2.5M7.3%
Year 2$1.3M+$1.8M$3.1M9.2%
Year 3$1.4M+$1.8M$3.2M9.3%
Year 4$1.4M+$1.8M$3.2M9.4%
Year 5$1.5M+$1.8M$3.3M9.5%
$12.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$35.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.3M
Value Created
$3.3M
Exit EBITDA
$2.0M
Organic Growth
$18.0M
RCM Value Creation
$3.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$342K$513K$684K$820K
Denial Rate Reductio$338K$508K$677K$812K
A/R Days Reduction$208K$312K$416K$499K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$899K$1.3M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 172 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.7%-19.8%-3.7%4.3%
P73
Net-to-Gross53.5%18.2%23.5%35.5%
P88
Occupancy91.1%43.9%57.0%73.7%
P94
Rev/Bed$356K$506K$950K$2.1M
P9
Exp/Bed$343K$591K$1.1M$2.2M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML