Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ALHAMBRA 2026-04-26 02:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ALHAMBRA
CCN 054032 | CA | 97 beds | Current EBITDA $16.6M → Pro Forma $19.2M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$48.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$19.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$671K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$962K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$952K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$585K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$31K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$962K$962K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$926K$26K$952K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$148K$438K$585K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$31K$31K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$240K$481K$721K$962K$962K$962K$962K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$238K$476K$714K$952K$952K$952K$952K
A/R Days Reduction$0$195K$390K$585K$585K$585K$585K$585K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K
Cumulative$0$689K$1.4M$2.1M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
9.0x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
10.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.0x
12.0x26% / 3.1x31% / 3.9x35% / 4.6x38% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16.6M$16.6M34.6%
Year 1$17.1M+$1.7M$18.8M39.1%
Year 2$17.6M+$2.5M$20.2M42.0%
Year 3$18.2M+$2.5M$20.7M43.1%
Year 4$18.7M+$2.5M$21.3M44.2%
Year 5$19.3M+$2.5M$21.8M45.4%
$166.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$239.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$73.6M
Value Created
$21.8M
Exit EBITDA
$26.5M
Organic Growth
$25.3M
RCM Value Creation
$21.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$481K$721K$962K$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$476K$714K$952K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$293K$439K$585K$702K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$31K$37K
Total$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 172 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin34.6%-19.8%-3.9%4.3%
P99
Net-to-Gross61.8%18.1%23.4%35.5%
P94
Occupancy90.9%43.7%57.0%72.9%
P93
Rev/Bed$496K$506K$934K$2.1M
P22
Exp/Bed$324K$571K$1.1M$2.2M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML