Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES
CCN 053302 | CA | 413 beds | Current EBITDA $-444.5M → Pro Forma $-380.9M (+$63.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.21B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-444.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$63.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-380.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$46.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$63.6M
Modeled Uplift
$45.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$17.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $45.6M (vs $63.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$24.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$23.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$14.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$773K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$63.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$24.2M$24.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$23.3M$665K$23.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.7M$11.0M$14.7M$46.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$773K$773K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.0M$12.1M$18.1M$24.2M$24.2M$24.2M$24.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.0M$12.0M$17.9M$23.9M$23.9M$23.9M$23.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.9M$9.8M$14.7M$14.7M$14.7M$14.7M$14.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$387K$773K$773K$773K$773K$773K$773K
Cumulative$0$17.3M$34.6M$51.5M$63.6M$63.6M$63.6M$63.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $63.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-444.5M$-444.5M-36.8%
Year 1$-457.8M+$42.4M$-415.4M-34.4%
Year 2$-471.5M+$63.6M$-408.0M-33.8%
Year 3$-485.7M+$63.6M$-422.1M-34.9%
Year 4$-500.2M+$63.6M$-436.7M-36.1%
Year 5$-515.2M+$63.6M$-451.7M-37.4%
$-4.44B
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.97B
Exit EV (11x)
$-523.9M
Value Created
$-451.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-707.9M
Organic Growth
$635.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-451.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$12.1M$18.1M$24.2M$29.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$12.0M$17.9M$23.9M$28.7M
A/R Days Reduction$7.4M$11.0M$14.7M$17.6M
Clean Claim Rate$387K$580K$773K$928K
Total$31.8M$47.7M$63.6M$76.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 140 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-36.8%-15.4%-4.2%3.8%
P6
Net-to-Gross31.1%18.6%23.8%29.2%
P84
Occupancy75.3%55.2%66.5%75.8%
P73
Rev/Bed$2.9M$1.4M$1.9M$2.8M
P78
Exp/Bed$4.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.8M
P90

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML