Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PALOMAR HEALTH REHABILITATION INSTIT 2026-04-26 13:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PALOMAR HEALTH REHABILITATION INSTIT
CCN 053043 | CA | 52 beds | Current EBITDA $1.7M → Pro Forma $2.8M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$789K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$709K
Risk-Adjusted
-$372K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$411K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$407K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$250K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$411K$411K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$396K$11K$407K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$63K$187K$250K$789K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$103K$206K$308K$411K$411K$411K$411K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$102K$204K$305K$407K$407K$407K$407K
A/R Days Reduction$0$83K$167K$250K$250K$250K$250K$250K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$295K$589K$877K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.3x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x
9.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
10.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
11.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
12.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.3x
Headroom (turns)
20%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 20% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.7M$1.7M8.4%
Year 1$1.8M+$721K$2.5M12.2%
Year 2$1.8M+$1.1M$2.9M14.2%
Year 3$1.9M+$1.1M$3.0M14.4%
Year 4$1.9M+$1.1M$3.0M14.7%
Year 5$2.0M+$1.1M$3.1M15.0%
$17.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$33.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.6M
Value Created
$3.1M
Exit EBITDA
$2.8M
Organic Growth
$10.8M
RCM Value Creation
$3.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$206K$308K$411K$493K
Denial Rate Reductio$204K$305K$407K$488K
A/R Days Reduction$125K$188K$250K$300K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$13K$16K
Total$541K$811K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 98 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.4%-22.8%-4.7%3.5%
P85
Net-to-Gross41.9%20.6%27.9%42.5%
P72
Occupancy44.0%40.5%56.9%71.5%
P30
Rev/Bed$395K$490K$763K$2.1M
P15
Exp/Bed$362K$517K$832K$2.2M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML