Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 08:50 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 053031 | CA | 86 beds | Current EBITDA $83K → Pro Forma $2.3M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$42.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$83K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$662K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$842K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$834K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$513K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$842K$842K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$811K$23K$834K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$129K$383K$513K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$211K$421K$632K$842K$842K$842K$842K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$208K$417K$625K$834K$834K$834K$834K
A/R Days Reduction$0$171K$342K$513K$513K$513K$513K$513K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$603K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x188% / 199.6x195% / 222.2x200% / 244.7x203% / 256.0x206% / 267.3x
9.0x182% / 177.1x188% / 197.1x193% / 217.2x196% / 227.2x199% / 237.2x
10.0x176% / 159.1x182% / 177.1x187% / 195.1x190% / 204.1x192% / 213.2x
11.0x170% / 144.3x176% / 160.7x182% / 177.1x184% / 185.3x187% / 193.5x
12.0x166% / 132.0x171% / 147.0x177% / 162.1x179% / 169.6x182% / 177.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.2x
Headroom (turns)
95%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 95% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.3x, adding 8.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$83K$83K0.2%
Year 1$86K+$1.5M$1.6M3.7%
Year 2$88K+$2.2M$2.3M5.5%
Year 3$91K+$2.2M$2.3M5.5%
Year 4$94K+$2.2M$2.3M5.5%
Year 5$97K+$2.2M$2.3M5.5%
$833K
Entry EV (10x)
$25.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.6M
Value Created
$2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$133K
Organic Growth
$22.2M
RCM Value Creation
$2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$421K$632K$842K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$417K$625K$834K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$256K$384K$513K$615K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$27K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 165 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.2%-19.5%-3.9%4.2%
P65
Net-to-Gross65.4%18.9%25.1%36.1%
P96
Occupancy71.5%43.6%57.0%73.4%
P73
Rev/Bed$490K$508K$937K$2.1M
P21
Exp/Bed$489K$597K$1.1M$2.3M
P19

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML