Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL RIVERSIDE 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL RIVERSIDE
CCN 052052 | CA | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.3M → Pro Forma $167K (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$167K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$371K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$576K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$570K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$351K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$576K$576K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$555K$16K$570K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$88K$262K$351K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$144K$288K$432K$576K$576K$576K$576K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$143K$285K$428K$570K$570K$570K$570K
A/R Days Reduction$0$117K$234K$351K$351K$351K$351K$351K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$413K$826K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-68.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
74.9x
Headroom (turns)
1153%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1153% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -68.4x, adding 167.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.3M$-1.3M-4.7%
Year 1$-1.4M+$1.0M$-379K-1.3%
Year 2$-1.4M+$1.5M$85K0.3%
Year 3$-1.5M+$1.5M$42K0.1%
Year 4$-1.5M+$1.5M$-2K-0.0%
Year 5$-1.6M+$1.5M$-48K-0.2%
$-13.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-528K
Exit EV (11x)
$13.0M
Value Created
$-48K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.1M
Organic Growth
$15.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-48K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$288K$432K$576K$691K
Denial Rate Reductio$285K$428K$570K$685K
A/R Days Reduction$175K$263K$351K$421K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$758K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.7%-21.0%-6.4%1.6%
P57
Net-to-Gross16.1%24.9%33.2%45.7%
P9
Occupancy91.4%35.2%53.6%70.7%
P99
Rev/Bed$720K$506K$1.3M$2.7M
P33
Exp/Bed$754K$638K$1.5M$2.9M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML