Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL SOUTH BAY 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL SOUTH BAY
CCN 052050 | CA | 59 beds | Current EBITDA $-628K → Pro Forma $1.5M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$39.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-628K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$553K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$790K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$782K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$481K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$790K$790K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$760K$22K$782K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$121K$359K$481K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$198K$395K$593K$790K$790K$790K$790K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$196K$391K$587K$782K$782K$782K$782K
A/R Days Reduction$0$160K$320K$481K$481K$481K$481K$481K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$566K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-3.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
10.2x
Headroom (turns)
156%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 156% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -3.7x, adding 102.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-628K$-628K-1.6%
Year 1$-646K+$1.4M$739K1.9%
Year 2$-666K+$2.1M$1.4M3.6%
Year 3$-686K+$2.1M$1.4M3.5%
Year 4$-706K+$2.1M$1.4M3.5%
Year 5$-728K+$2.1M$1.4M3.4%
$-6.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$14.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.1M
Value Created
$1.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-1000K
Organic Growth
$20.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$395K$593K$790K$948K
Denial Rate Reductio$391K$587K$782K$939K
A/R Days Reduction$240K$361K$481K$577K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$25K$30K
Total$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 120 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.6%-23.1%-6.2%1.8%
P66
Net-to-Gross17.7%19.9%25.8%39.0%
P18
Occupancy76.9%39.8%54.7%70.9%
P84
Rev/Bed$670K$493K$763K$1.9M
P44
Exp/Bed$680K$514K$801K$1.9M
P39

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML