Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — 1125 SIR FRANCIS DRAKE OPERATING CO 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — 1125 SIR FRANCIS DRAKE OPERATING CO
CCN 052043 | CA | 105 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.1M → Pro Forma $-2.2M (+$3.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$74.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$3.9M
Modeled Uplift
$2.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.8M (vs $3.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$902K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$47K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$41K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$227K$674K$902K$2.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$47K$47K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$370K$741K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$367K$733K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$300K$601K$902K$902K$902K$902K$902K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.1M$-6.1M-8.3%
Year 1$-6.3M+$2.6M$-3.7M-5.0%
Year 2$-6.5M+$3.9M$-2.6M-3.5%
Year 3$-6.7M+$3.9M$-2.8M-3.8%
Year 4$-6.9M+$3.9M$-3.0M-4.1%
Year 5$-7.1M+$3.9M$-3.2M-4.3%
$-61.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-35.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$26.0M
Value Created
$-3.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-9.8M
Organic Growth
$39.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$741K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$733K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$451K$676K$902K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$36K$47K$57K
Total$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 172 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.3%-20.8%-4.7%4.2%
P40
Net-to-Gross43.3%17.6%22.3%30.6%
P85
Occupancy76.0%43.7%57.5%72.5%
P80
Rev/Bed$706K$550K$984K$2.1M
P35
Exp/Bed$764K$624K$1.1M$2.3M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML