Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL ONTARIO 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL ONTARIO
CCN 052037 | CA | 91 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.4M → Pro Forma $-2.4M (+$3.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$56.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$3.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$844K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.1M (vs $3.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$688K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$36K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$31K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$173K$515K$688K$2.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$36K$36K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$283K$565K$848K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$280K$560K$840K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$229K$459K$688K$688K$688K$688K$688K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K
Cumulative$0$810K$1.6M$2.4M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.4M$-5.4M-9.5%
Year 1$-5.6M+$2.0M$-3.6M-6.3%
Year 2$-5.7M+$3.0M$-2.7M-4.8%
Year 3$-5.9M+$3.0M$-2.9M-5.2%
Year 4$-6.1M+$3.0M$-3.1M-5.5%
Year 5$-6.2M+$3.0M$-3.3M-5.8%
$-53.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-36.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.9M
Value Created
$-3.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-8.6M
Organic Growth
$29.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$565K$848K$1.1M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$560K$840K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$344K$516K$688K$826K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$27K$36K$43K
Total$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 167 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.5%-20.3%-3.9%4.5%
P37
Net-to-Gross17.5%18.7%23.6%35.5%
P22
Occupancy74.9%43.8%57.0%74.1%
P76
Rev/Bed$621K$503K$962K$2.1M
P33
Exp/Bed$681K$586K$1.1M$2.2M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML