Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ARDEN WOOD INC. 2026-04-26 06:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ARDEN WOOD INC.
CCN 051993 | CA | 13 beds | Current EBITDA $272K → Pro Forma $465K (+$193K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$3.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$272K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$193K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$465K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+567bps
Margin Improvement
$131K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$193K
Modeled Uplift
$117K
Risk-Adjusted
-$76K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$74K
+217bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$68K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$41K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+28bp
Total EBITDA Impact$193K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$66K$8K$74K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$68K$68K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$10K$31K$41K$131K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$18K$37K$55K$74K$74K$74K$74K
Cost to Collect$0$17K$34K$51K$68K$68K$68K$68K
A/R Days Reduction$0$14K$28K$41K$41K$41K$41K$41K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$54K$108K$157K$193K$193K$193K$193K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $193K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x
9.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 12.9x
10.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
11.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
12.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$272K$272K8.0%
Year 1$281K+$129K$409K12.0%
Year 2$289K+$193K$482K14.2%
Year 3$298K+$193K$491K14.4%
Year 4$307K+$193K$500K14.7%
Year 5$316K+$193K$509K14.9%
$2.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.9M
Value Created
$509K
Exit EBITDA
$434K
Organic Growth
$1.9M
RCM Value Creation
$509K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$37K$55K$74K$89K
Cost to Collect$34K$51K$68K$82K
A/R Days Reduction$21K$31K$41K$50K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$96K$145K$193K$232K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-22.5%-10.9%-0.2%
P0
Net-to-Gross95.6%31.6%45.9%63.8%
P92
Occupancy20.4%19.5%36.0%64.2%
P28
Rev/Bed$262K$1.1M$2.3M$3.9M
P4
Exp/Bed$724K$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML