Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TAHOE FOREST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TAHOE FOREST HOSPITAL
CCN 051328 | CA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $34.2M → Pro Forma $48.1M (+$13.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$264.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$34.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$48.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

81%
Realization (B)
$13.9M
Modeled Uplift
$11.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.6M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 81% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.3M (vs $13.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$169K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.3M$5.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.1M$145K$5.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$811K$2.4M$3.2M$10.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$169K$169K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$85K$169K$169K$169K$169K$169K$169K
Cumulative$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.3M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x59% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x
11.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$34.2M$34.2M13.0%
Year 1$35.3M+$9.3M$44.5M16.8%
Year 2$36.3M+$13.9M$50.2M19.0%
Year 3$37.4M+$13.9M$51.3M19.4%
Year 4$38.5M+$13.9M$52.4M19.8%
Year 5$39.7M+$13.9M$53.6M20.3%
$342.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$589.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$247.2M
Value Created
$53.6M
Exit EBITDA
$54.5M
Organic Growth
$139.1M
RCM Value Creation
$53.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$85K$127K$169K$203K
Total$7.0M$10.4M$13.9M$16.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 72 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.0%-18.4%-8.1%1.7%
P93
Net-to-Gross50.4%29.0%41.6%61.1%
P62
Occupancy59.7%27.9%41.9%68.0%
P65
Rev/Bed$10.6M$768K$2.1M$3.3M
P97
Exp/Bed$9.2M$890K$2.1M$3.2M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML