Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY HOSP 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY HOSP
CCN 050779 | CA | 152 beds | Current EBITDA $11.4M → Pro Forma $18.9M (+$7.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$142.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$18.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$7.5M
Modeled Uplift
$5.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.7M (vs $7.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$91K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.8M$2.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.7M$78K$2.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$437K$1.3M$1.7M$5.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$91K$91K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$712K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$705K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$578K$1.2M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$46K$91K$91K$91K$91K$91K$91K
Cumulative$0$2.0M$4.1M$6.1M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.4M$11.4M8.0%
Year 1$11.7M+$5.0M$16.7M11.7%
Year 2$12.1M+$7.5M$19.6M13.7%
Year 3$12.4M+$7.5M$19.9M14.0%
Year 4$12.8M+$7.5M$20.3M14.3%
Year 5$13.2M+$7.5M$20.7M14.5%
$113.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$227.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$113.7M
Value Created
$20.7M
Exit EBITDA
$18.1M
Organic Growth
$74.9M
RCM Value Creation
$20.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$866K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$46K$68K$91K$109K
Total$3.7M$5.6M$7.5M$9.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 198 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-17.3%-3.9%4.5%
P0
Net-to-Gross3.9%18.2%22.3%28.9%
P0
Occupancy92.5%45.9%59.3%72.6%
P96
Rev/Bed$937K$709K$1.4M$2.2M
P37
Exp/Bed$2.7M$767K$1.5M$2.4M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML