Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KFH - SAN LEANDRO 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KFH - SAN LEANDRO
CCN 050777 | CA | 216 beds | Current EBITDA $68.4M → Pro Forma $103.3M (+$34.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$663.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$68.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$34.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$103.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$34.9M
Modeled Uplift
$25.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $25.0M (vs $34.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$425K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$34.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.3M$13.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.8M$365K$13.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$6.0M$8.1M$25.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$425K$425K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.3M$6.6M$10.0M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.9M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$212K$425K$425K$425K$425K$425K$425K
Cumulative$0$9.5M$19.0M$28.3M$34.9M$34.9M$34.9M$34.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $34.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
9.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
10.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$68.4M$68.4M10.3%
Year 1$70.5M+$23.3M$93.7M14.1%
Year 2$72.6M+$34.9M$107.5M16.2%
Year 3$74.8M+$34.9M$109.7M16.5%
Year 4$77.0M+$34.9M$111.9M16.9%
Year 5$79.3M+$34.9M$114.2M17.2%
$684.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.26B
Exit EV (11x)
$572.4M
Value Created
$114.2M
Exit EBITDA
$109.0M
Organic Growth
$349.2M
RCM Value Creation
$114.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.6M$10.0M$13.3M$15.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.6M$9.9M$13.1M$15.8M
A/R Days Reduction$4.0M$6.1M$8.1M$9.7M
Clean Claim Rate$212K$319K$425K$510K
Total$17.5M$26.2M$34.9M$41.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 208 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.3%-16.7%-4.0%4.5%
P86
Net-to-Gross32.2%17.2%22.3%28.8%
P84
Occupancy65.4%50.0%62.7%74.0%
P54
Rev/Bed$3.1M$1.0M$1.5M$2.4M
P87
Exp/Bed$2.8M$1.1M$1.7M$2.6M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML